Panel discussion on...
Pet Supplements
Jessica Simonis
Clinical Nutritionist, Australia

Member of AgroFOOD Industry Hi Tech's Scientific Advisory Board

Microbial Homeostasis Across Species: Shaping Health Outcomes for Pets and Their Owners
Companion animal health, like human health, is shaped by dynamic interactions among the genome, exposome, and microbiome (1, 2, 3). Although humans and their pets do not share a genome, they inhabit the same domestic environments, and are exposed to overlapping environmental stressors, including increasingly processed diets, antimicrobial use, and pollutants (3, 4). Close physical contact within shared households also facilitates microbial exchange, resulting in measurable overlap in skin, oral, and environmental microbiota – also referred to as the ‘familiome’ (5). Accumulating evidence suggests that shared environmental exposomes and microbiota contribute to parallel patterns of health and disease across species (6).
The World Health Organization’s One Health framework formally recognizes that human, animal, and environmental health are interdependent and must be addressed as an integrated system rather than in isolation (5). Within this paradigm, domestic dogs and cats increasingly exhibit disease phenotypes that resemble those observed in humans, including atopic dermatitis and obesity (7). These similarities are thought to reflect shared environmental pressures and associated perturbations of the gut and skin microbiota (3).
Direct microbial sharing between pets and owners has been linked to both health and disease. Cohabiting humans and dogs exhibit greater similarity in skin and household microbiota compared with non-cohabiting individuals (3, 8). While such exchanges may enable transmission of pathobionts, including antimicrobial-resistant organisms (9, 10), they may also confer immunological benefits, with early-life exposure to pet-associated microbes in humans associated with enhanced immune maturation and reduced risk of allergic sensitization (11, 12).
Taken together, current evidence supports a bidirectional, microbiome-mediated relationship between pets and their owners, shaped by shared environments. Microbial exchange can support human immune function, particularly in early life; however, pets may also act as reservoirs for pathobionts and antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can transfer to humans. Conversely, human dietary patterns, antimicrobial use, and lifestyle behaviours can disrupt microbial homeostasis in companion animals, contributing to inflammatory and metabolic disease. These reciprocal benefits and risks underscore the need for integrated, ecologically-informed health strategies that recognise pets and owners as a unified biological system.
Future models of pet care may therefore benefit from alignment with One Health principles, incorporating environmental stewardship, microbiome-conscious antimicrobial use, optimized nutrition, and coordinated veterinary–human health strategies. By addressing microbial homeostasis across species, such an approach has the potential to improve disease prevention, enhance immune and metabolic resilience, and redefine companion animal care within a systems-based framework.
4A) Over the next decade, credibility in the pet supplements sector will depend on robust, species-specific clinical evidence, microbiome-conscious formulations, transparent sourcing and alignment with One Health principles.
4B) The most impactful change would be mandatory evidence-based substantiation standards, requiring well-designed, peer-reviewed clinical trials in target species before market approval. Clear labelling of strain specificity, dosage, and safety risk would shift the sector from marketing-driven claims to science-led credibility, strengthening long-term consumer trust.
In this Panel Discussion, several prominent companies within the food and nutraceutical ingredient industry have been invited to discuss about drivers and barriers of healthy lifestyle, focusing on global and regional consumer trends, scientific achievements, emerging delivery formats, use of AI technologies and the implementation of the United Nations sustainability goals.
Panelists
References and notes
- Trinh P, Zaneveld JR, Safranek S, Rabinowitz PM. One health relationships between human, animal, and environmental microbiomes: a mini-review. Frontiers in public health. 2018 Aug 30;6:235.
- Simonis J. The microbial web: Exploring the interconnection between microbiome, human and planetary health. Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine. 2022 Jan 1;41(3):8-15.
- Kappala S. The gut microbiome and health of companion animals: Insights into physiology, dysbiosis and disease association.
- Hernandez J, Rhimi S, Kriaa A, Mariaule V, Boudaya H, Drut A, Jablaoui A, Mkaouar H, Saidi A, Biourge V, Borgi MA. Domestic environment and gut microbiota: lessons from pet dogs. Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 30;10(5):949.
- Skoufos S, Stavropoulou E, Tsigalou C, Voidarou C. Microbial Interconnections in One Health: A Critical Nexus Between Companion Animals and Human Microbiomes. Microorganisms. 2025 Jul 3;13(7):1564.
- Marsella R, De Benedetto A. Atopic dermatitis in animals and people: an update and comparative review. Veterinary sciences. 2017 Jul 26;4(3):37.
- Suarez L, Bautista-Castaño I, Peña Romera C, Montoya-Alonso JA, Corbera JA. Is dog owner obesity a risk factor for canine obesity? a “one-health” study on human–animal interaction in a region with a high prevalence of obesity. Veterinary Sciences. 2022 May 22;9(5):243.
- Mäki JM, Kirjavainen PV, Täubel M, Piippo-Savolainen E, Backman K, Hyvärinen A, Tuoresmäki P, Jayaprakash B, Heinrich J, Herberth G, Standl M. Associations between dog keeping and indoor dust microbiota. Scientific Reports. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5341.
- Ma LC, Zhao HQ, Wu LB, Cheng ZL, Liu C. Impact of the microbiome on human, animal, and environmental health from a One Health perspective. Science in One Health. 2023 Jan 1;2:100037.
- Cui W, Cui Y, Hao Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Liu F, Long J, Jin Y, Chen S, Duan G, Yang H. The effect of pet dog exposure on gut antibiotic resistome and microbiome of their owners. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2026 Feb 8:141429.
- Hesselmar B, Hicke-Roberts A, Lundell AC, Adlerberth I, Rudin A, Saalman R, Wennergren G, Wold AE. Pet-keeping in early life reduces the risk of allergy in a dose-dependent fashion. PloS one. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0208472.
- Indolfi C, D’Addio E, Bencivenga CL, Rivetti G, Bettini I, Licari A, Manti S, Mori F, Miraglia del Giudice M, Klain A. The primary prevention of atopy: does early exposure to cats and dogs prevent the development of allergy and asthma in children? A comprehensive analysis of the literature. Life. 2023 Sep 2;13(9):1859.
Questions
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ingredients companies - clinical data
A) What are the main scientific gaps that still exist in PET supplement development compared to human dietary supplements?
B) How important is species-specific research when selecting and developing active ingredients for pets? Can human data ever be sufficient?
C) Is the humanization of pets helping consumers make better-informed choices, or does it risk creating unrealistic expectations about supplement performance?
D) From an ingredient supplier’s perspective, which quality parameters (standardization, bioavailability, purity) are most critical for PET applications?
E) How are trends such as “clean label,” sustainability, and transparency influencing pet owners’ purchasing decisions in the PET supplement space?
F) What type of clinical evidence should realistically be expected to support PET supplement claims today?
G) Which types of claims are most likely to be misunderstood by consumers, and how can this risk be reduced through clearer substantiation and labeling?
H) What are the main methodological challenges in conducting clinical trials for companion animals, and how can they be addressed?
I) How reliable are owner-reported outcomes compared to veterinary assessments, and how should they be integrated into study design?
L) Have you noticed an increasing trend in the use of one (or more) ingredients for pet supplements formulated to promote healthy ageing?
Formulation
A) What are the biggest formulation challenges in PET supplements, particularly regarding palatability, stability, and dosing accuracy?
B) How do formulation choices (e.g., chews, powders, liquids) influence compliance and consistent use from a consumer perspective?
C) Do you see a shift toward simpler, single-ingredient formulations, or are multi-active blends still the dominant approach? Why?
D) How do species differences (dogs vs cats, size, age) influence formulation strategies?
E) Omega 3 alternatives for pet nutrition and sustainability: how do the innovative omega-3s for pet food stack up against their traditional fishy counterparts?
Regulation
A) How do regulatory frameworks for PET supplements differ between the EU and the US, and what challenges do these differences create for global brands?
B) Which types of claims represent the highest regulatory risk today, and which are more likely to be acceptable if properly substantiated?
C) Do you expect regulatory oversight of PET supplements to become stricter in the coming years? Why or why not?
D) What role should veterinarians play in guiding pet owners’ choices regarding PET supplements, and how can trust between brands, vets, and consumers be strengthened?
Open questions
A) Looking ahead 5–10 years, what will be the key factors determining the credibility and long-term success of the PET supplements sector?
B) In your view, what single change—scientific, regulatory, or educational—would most improve consumer trust in PET supplements over the next decade?
References and notes










